From: Ken Garlington <garlingtonke@lmtas.lmco.com>
Subject: Re: The Ada Compiler Evaluation System
Date: 1996/04/26
Date: 1996-04-26T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3180CC5C.321F@lmtas.lmco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: dewar.830400776@schonberg
Robert Dewar wrote:
>
> A starting point would be to study what has already been decided in this
> area by the project team and advisory committee for the new ACVC test
> suite. In particular, I would take a little time to study the ACVC suite,
> both old and new.
Been there, done that. Even after I quoted excerpts from the ACVC 2.0
documentation, the response has been to RTFM and to "stop bashing those
poor ACVC folks."
No possible benefit is possible from this conversation. I withdraw. Good bye.
--
LMTAS - "Our Brand Means Quality"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-04-26 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-04-17 0:00 The Ada Compiler Evaluation System Philip Brashear
1996-04-18 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1996-04-21 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-04-22 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1996-04-24 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-04-26 0:00 ` Ken Garlington [this message]
1996-04-27 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-04-29 0:00 ` Laurent Guerby
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox