From: "Linh C. Nguyen" <Linh.C.Nguyen@cpmx.saic.com>
To: Kenneth Mays <KMays@msn.com>
Subject: Re: Does Ada95 beat FORTRAN?!?
Date: 1996/04/20
Date: 1996-04-20T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <317906B6.42853EF6@cpmx.saic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 00001a73+00002ce8@msn.com
Kenneth Mays wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I was interested in replacing a lot of old Fortran-77 code with Ada
> code. Does anyone feel that Ada95 is
> better than FORTRAN? Should we replace this old programming language
> with a better one? Should we
> RETRAIN the thinking processes of our MBA students that FORTRAN (that
> great formula translator of 1977) should
> be maintained but not used for future development?
>
> From what we have have seen of Ada95, does it measure up?
>
> Ken (kmays@msn.com)
> USAF
Not by the engineer or scientist's point of view.
--
Linh.C.Nguyen@cpmx.saic.com
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-04-20 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-04-20 0:00 Does Ada95 beat FORTRAN?!? Kenneth Mays
1996-04-20 0:00 ` Linh C. Nguyen [this message]
1996-04-20 0:00 ` Chris Morgan
1996-04-21 0:00 ` busigin
1996-04-21 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-04-22 0:00 ` David Weller
1996-04-22 0:00 ` Theodore E. Dennison
1996-04-22 0:00 `
1996-04-22 0:00 ` Thomas Koenig
1996-04-29 0:00 ` marukka
1996-04-22 0:00 ` Theodore E. Dennison
1996-04-23 0:00 ` David Kristola
1996-04-23 0:00 ` Jim Carr
1996-04-26 0:00 ` Peter Hermann
1996-04-29 0:00 ` AdaWorks
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox