From: Martin Krischik <krischik@users.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: Only one Ada vendor?
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 19:23:55 +0200
Date: 2007-10-21T19:23:55+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3178697.p0Bn0lCN4l@linux1.krischik.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1192806306.892546.73350@q5g2000prf.googlegroups.com
Sloan.Kohler@gmail.com wrote:
> Its Friday - thought I would try to stir things up...
>
> Several people have stated that "Ada" refers to the latest approved
> version (i.e., Ada => "Ada 2005"). Its been well over a year since
> AdaCore announced Ada 2005 support started shipping a pretty complete
> implementation. As far as I know, no other vendor has yet announced
> any intention to support the current standard. Maybe they're working
> on it in secrecy. Maybe they are waiting on customer demand. Maybe
> they have already lost most of their customers to AdaCore and simply
> don't care anymore.
The funny thing is: The is only one C and C++ vendor which *fully* supports
C 99 and C++ 2003. Perhaps full standart compliance is out of fashion :-( .
Martin
--
mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net
Ada programming at: http://ada.krischik.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-21 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-19 15:05 Only one Ada vendor? Sloan.Kohler
2007-10-20 0:49 ` Randy Brukardt
2007-10-20 2:08 ` Nasser Abbasi
2007-10-20 7:39 ` Simon Wright
2007-10-21 20:57 ` Florian Weimer
2007-10-21 17:23 ` Martin Krischik [this message]
2007-10-21 17:33 ` Gary Scott
2007-10-21 19:42 ` Maciej Sobczak
2007-10-21 23:57 ` Robert A Duff
2007-10-22 12:36 ` Georg Bauhaus
2007-10-22 20:55 ` Maciej Sobczak
2007-10-25 9:33 ` llothar
2007-10-25 9:58 ` Ludovic Brenta
2007-10-25 20:35 ` adaworks
2007-10-28 5:44 ` anon
2007-10-28 8:04 ` Pascal Obry
2007-10-28 11:13 ` Jerry van Dijk
2007-10-29 11:36 ` Georg Bauhaus
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox