From: Ted Dennison <dennison@escmail.orl.mmc.com>
Subject: Re: Ada-95 for numerics?
Date: 1996/04/01
Date: 1996-04-01T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <316005FE.204F@escmail.orl.mmc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 4jocek$h5h@rigel.rz.uni-ulm.de
Joerg Rodemann wrote:
>
> I tested the following languages/compilers:
>
> 3.) Ada-95:
> Compilers: GNAT 3.01/gcc-2.7.2
...
> This were the results:
>
> 4.) The Ada-95 version was about a factor of 6 slower than the other ones.
You mean the "GNAT version". Just because your one Ada-95 compiler was
slow says nothing about the language.
BTW: The other compilers you mentioned are all more "mature" than
GNAT. This means they have had way more time to work on optimizations.
--
T.E.D.
| Work - mailto:dennison@escmail.orl.mmc.com |
| Home - mailto:dennison@iag.net |
| URL - http://www.iag.net/~dennison |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-04-01 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-04-01 0:00 Ada-95 for numerics? Joerg Rodemann
1996-04-01 0:00 ` Ted Dennison [this message]
1996-04-01 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-04-01 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-04-02 0:00 ` michael
1996-04-02 0:00 ` Dale Stanbrough
1996-04-03 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1996-04-02 0:00 Jean-Pierre Rosen
1996-04-03 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
1996-04-02 0:00 Joerg Rodemann
1996-04-02 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-04-05 0:00 Dr J Parker
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox