From: Ted Dennison <dennison@escmail.orl.mmc.com>
Subject: Re: Language Implementation Survey
Date: 1996/03/28
Date: 1996-03-28T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <315B6120.4E1C@escmail.orl.mmc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 315AA754.167EB0E7@ix.netcom.com
Howard R. Stearns wrote:
>
> Here are the survey results. The first two sections give the numbers
> and percentages
...
> Some respondents listed more than one language as being their most
> prefered (even while evaluating the implementation for a single
> langage). Languages described as being favored:
> CL was favored 27 times (31%).
> C++ was favored 13 times (15%).
Your top answer had only 27 responses?
I think this may qualify you for "most comprehensive, yet unscientific
study ever". Congradulations! Someone should call Guiness.
--
T.E.D.
| Work - mailto:dennison@escmail.orl.mmc.com |
| Home - mailto:dennison@iag.net |
| URL - http://www.iag.net/~dennison |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-03-28 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-03-28 0:00 Language Implementation Survey Howard R. Stearns
1996-03-28 0:00 ` Ted Dennison [this message]
1996-03-29 0:00 ` Scott Leschke
1996-03-30 0:00 ` Chris Trimble
1996-03-30 0:00 ` Richard Pitre
1996-04-01 0:00 ` M. Alan Newman
1996-04-02 0:00 ` Ron Stodden
1996-04-02 0:00 ` Chris Trimble
1996-03-31 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-04-01 0:00 ` Thomas Lindgren
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox