From: Ken Garlington <garlingtonke@lfwc.lockheed.com>
Subject: Re: AJPO is still clueless about the reality of DoD Ada rejection
Date: 1996/03/21
Date: 1996-03-21T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <315154FC.479B@lfwc.lockheed.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 314D8721.7E36@lfwc.lockheed.com
> Ken, you know we're both on the same side, BUT you and I both know of
> cases where more money was spent (in manhours) justifying a Ada waiver
> than would have been used if they had just done the Ada like good little
> boys and girls. [yet another anecdone published].
I absolutely agree that there are cases where Ada policy is abused.
I also absolutely agree that there are cases where traffic laws are abused.
I'm not quite ready to say that either is useless, however.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-03-21 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-03-15 0:00 AJPO is still clueless about the reality of DoD Ada rejection Gregory Aharonian
1996-03-18 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1996-03-18 0:00 ` Byron B. Kauffman
1996-03-21 0:00 ` Ken Garlington [this message]
1996-03-28 0:00 ` Peter Finney
1996-03-19 0:00 ` Robert Munck
1996-03-19 0:00 ` Is COTS the answer? Ted Dennison
1996-03-25 0:00 ` AdaWorks
1996-03-20 0:00 ` AJPO is still clueless about the reality of DoD Ada rejection David Emery
1996-03-20 0:00 ` David Emery
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox