From: barmar@kulla (Barry Margolin)
Subject: Re: Inheritance & limited private types
Date: 22 Oct 89 20:22:05 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <31018@news.Think.COM> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 126675@sun.Eng.Sun.COM
In article <126675@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> grover@sun.UUCP (Vinod Grover) writes:
>For those of us without profilers, I suppose, there is no hope. Or perhaps
>we should worry about efficiency before the product has been developed, or
>perhaps not to worry about efficiency at all.
Making a program efficient without a profiler is like making a program work
without a debugger. Sure, you can manually sprinkle your code with print
statements and timing statements, but it's not an efficient way to do it.
Barry Margolin, Thinking Machines Corp.
barmar@think.com
{uunet,harvard}!think!barmar
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1989-10-22 20:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1989-10-16 13:57 Does Ada really need MULTIPLE inheritance? "Norman H. Cohen"
1989-10-17 17:23 ` David A Eichmann,316K
1989-10-17 20:49 ` David Chase
1989-10-21 19:39 ` Inheritance & limited private types William Thomas Wolfe, 2847
1989-10-22 7:00 ` Vinod Grover
1989-10-22 18:03 ` Inheritance & limited private t stt
1989-10-22 20:22 ` Barry Margolin [this message]
1989-10-23 0:39 ` Inheritance & limited private types Ted Dunning
1989-10-27 15:44 ` Paul Pedersen
1989-10-27 17:50 ` Robert Firth
1989-10-27 22:32 ` Profiling (was Re: Inheritance & limited private types) Barry Margolin
1989-10-27 0:04 ` Inheritance & limited private types Dick Karpinski
1989-10-30 17:12 ` Does Ada really need MULTIPLE inheritance? Paul Baker
1989-10-19 2:27 ` William Thomas Wolfe, 2847
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox