From: "Robert C. Leif, Ph.D." <rleif@RLEIF.COM>
Subject: Re: Warning: Religious naming convention discussion :
Date: 1997/05/12
Date: 1997-05-12T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3.0.32.19970512192732.00733858@mail.4dcomm.com> (raw)
From: Bob (Robert) Leif, Ph.D. (RCL)
to: John G. Volan, Prof. Dewar, et al.
Please excuse, if I (RCL) messed up on the attribution
I believe John G. Volan is the 0 and 2 '>'
and Robert Dewar is the single '>'
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sun, 11 May 1997 23:13:56 -0700
From: "John G. Volan" <johnvolan@SPRINTMAIL.COM>
Subject: Re: Warning: Religious naming convention discussion
>
> JRe: Warning: Religious naming convention discussion : wrote:
>
> > But once again, I'd want the rule to be simple and minimalistic: Just
> > always mark access types (and access objects) with "_Pointer".
>
> Bad suggestion. Access types are NOT pointers.
SNIP until end
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------
One trivial solution to the designation of a type as an access type, is to
use "_ac". This is a readable short abbreviation. At least, I have already
used it. This is another advantage of Ada syntax. I do not know of an
equivalent two character abbreviation for pointer.
reply other threads:[~1997-05-12 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox