Re: Ada95 and UML

[John Robinson <john@JohnRobinsonAndAssociates.com>]

In article <ji%A6.9$bU3.618@nnrp1.sbc.net>, Pat Rogers
<progers@classwide.com> writes

<snip>

>> generates each object as a separate package with only one type, making it
>> difficult to use Ada the way we are used to).
>
>There's no "rule" per se, but that is what I would consider the normal
>default.  Certainly one will have ancillary types in the same package, but
>they would be in support of the "primary" abstraction represented by the UML
>object.  

I'd make a quick comment to lend further support to that style of UML-
Ada95 mapping, even though I for one have been dragged over the coals
for saying this on this newsgroup in the past.

<snip>

I'd also make a shameless plug for two conferences which may be of
interest to anyone following this thread:

"UML for Real-Time Systems Development"
28th June, Newbury, UK
see www.Adaxia.com for more details, or send me an email to request a
draft programme.

I understand that Ada UK is organising a one-day event on Reliable OOP
(using Ada obviously) in October (see www.Adauk.org.uk for more detail
when available).
-- 
John Robinson

www.JohnRobinsonAndAssociates.com
www.Adaxia.com