comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Subject: Re: interface type question
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 16:11:30 -0500
Date: 2005-08-10T16:11:30-05:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2oWdnfreeKgu8WffRVn-oA@megapath.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 42f92725$0$6966$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net

It's wrong; someone pointed that out during the reviews at the York ARG
meeting and it has been fixed.
Thanks for pointing it out, though.

               Randy Brukardt, ARG Editor

"Georg Bauhaus" <bauhaus@futureapps.de> wrote in message
news:42f92725$0$6966$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net...
> hi,
> clause 3.9.4 about Interface Types in Amendment-D12.html
> has an example where a Queue interfaces is parenting a
> Synchronized_Queue interface. An explaining paragraph
> follows and says, "The Synchronized_Queue interface ...
> adds two additional dispatching operations."
>
> But does it add any dispatching operation to Synchronized_Queue?
>
> "type Queue is limited interface;
> procedure Append(Q : in out Queue; Element : in Person_Name) is abstract;
> ...
>
> "type Synchronized_Queue is synchronized interface and Queue; -- see 9.11
> procedure Append_Wait(Q : in out Queue; Element : in Person_Name) is
abstract;
> ..."
>
> By habit I had assumed that the first parameter of Append_Wait
> should be Synchronized_Queue, not Queue. Is this Correct?
>
>
> http://www.ada-auth.org/ai-files/grab_bag/Amendment-D12.html
> (big)
>
> -- Georg





      reply	other threads:[~2005-08-10 21:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-08-09 21:59 interface type question Georg Bauhaus
2005-08-10 21:11 ` Randy Brukardt [this message]
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox