Re: setjmp/longjmp?

["Jeff C," <nolongersafeto@userealemailsniff.com>]

Looks like the easiest thing would be to just release it under the same
terms as libpng itself although
I don't see anthing about this license that would make it conflict with the
GMGPL.

Of course...the old standby...I am not a lawyer.

"chris" <spamoff.danx@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:C_Fdb.2031$QH3.1956@newsfep4-winn.server.ntli.net...
> Jeff C, wrote:
> >
> > A binding to libpng would be nice so don't let me stop you but have you
>  > looked
> > into whether http://privatewww.essex.ac.uk/~sjs/png_io/png_io.html will
work
> > for you.
>
> No I hadn't, thanks.  I think it'd be best just to go ahead and bind to
> libpng, since otherwise it probably won't ever get done.  I just hope it
> will get used.  If anyone wants a copy before it's finished let me know.
>
> I'm a wee bit shaky on the license of LibPNG, and am not sure what
> license to release it under.  I'd like to release it either under the
> MIT license or GMGPL but don't know if these are compatible with LibPNG.
>   It looks like a MIT style license.
>
>
>
> Chris
>