From: "Nick Roberts" <nick.roberts@acm.org>
Subject: Re: High CPU in tasking
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 18:00:33 +0100
Date: 2004-06-24T18:00:33+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2k0fllF160eotU1@uni-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: slrncdltli.nr.lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de
"Lutz Donnerhacke" <lutz@iks-jena.de> wrote in message
news:slrncdltli.nr.lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de...
> In order to stop others falling into the same mistake, I debugged
> several days.
> ...
I'm obviously only guessing at the details of your application, Lutz, but
gleaning what I can, I'm surprised that you seem to be talking about one
buffer. Do you not have a separate buffer for each reader (of a single
demultiplexed stream)? Also, what were the priorities of the tasks?
--
Nick Roberts
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-24 17:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-24 15:43 High CPU in tasking Lutz Donnerhacke
2004-06-24 17:00 ` Nick Roberts [this message]
2004-06-24 20:25 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2004-06-24 21:56 ` Nick Roberts
2004-06-25 7:34 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2004-06-25 17:03 ` Nick Roberts
2004-06-28 8:32 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2004-06-29 17:26 ` Nick Roberts
2004-06-30 12:26 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2004-06-30 23:39 ` Randy Brukardt
2004-07-01 7:02 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2004-06-25 21:15 ` Mark Lorenzen
2004-06-26 8:01 ` Wojtek Narczynski
2004-06-28 8:17 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox