From: Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Large Integer Overflow - Causing a Bottleneck - Any solution.
Date: Thu, 04 May 2017 17:56:04 -0400
Date: 2017-05-04T17:56:04-04:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2i8ngchvp7vkghm6hgh01vql126bn7gvq5@4ax.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: lyfugkk1hr.fsf@pushface.org
On Thu, 04 May 2017 17:53:04 +0100, Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
declaimed the following:
>so on that platform I stand by Long_Integer. Might be different on a
>32-bit platform, I guess, but I don't have one.
I believe the only build for Windows is designed to be 32-bit
compatible (heck, I think it relies on a 32-bit MINGW)...
Yes -- only 32-bit build is available for Windows... I suppose one /could/
install the 64-bit Linux build into the Win10 BASH shell environment, but
that won't build Windows native executables.
--
Wulfraed Dennis Lee Bieber AF6VN
wlfraed@ix.netcom.com HTTP://wlfraed.home.netcom.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-04 21:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-02 14:48 Large Integer Overflow - Causing a Bottleneck - Any solution Austin Obyrne
2017-05-02 20:13 ` Rich
2017-05-03 15:05 ` Luke A. Guest
2017-05-03 16:29 ` Rich
2017-05-03 16:18 ` Simon Wright
2017-05-04 15:49 ` Stephen Davies
2017-05-04 16:53 ` Simon Wright
2017-05-04 21:56 ` Dennis Lee Bieber [this message]
2017-05-05 8:28 ` Austin Obyrne
2017-05-04 21:49 ` Dennis Lee Bieber
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox