Re: Ada OOP syntax

[markus034@gmail.com]

On Jun 17, 7:14 pm, "Steve" <nospam_steve...@comcast.net> wrote:
> "Oliver Kellogg" <okell...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote in message
>
> news:g313nr$uih$1@online.de...
>
> > Steve wrote:
>
> >> For a programming language that has so much right, Ada sure has oop
> >> syntax
> >> wrong.  What's more is the syntax is inconsistant with a lot of things
> >> that Ada got right and other languages didn't.
>
> > Do you knowhttp://mats.weber.org/thesis/Ada-Extensions.pdf?
>
> > Not sure if it's spot on for you but well worth the read, IMHO.
>
> I haven't read the entire document yet, but plan to.  It looks very
> interesting indeed.
>
> Regards,
> Steve
>
>
>
> > --Oliver

Especially, package types and package subtypes are very interesting.
That syntax seems to be clearer than tagged types. I don't understand
why it was rejected?