Re: Variant record assignment fails discriminant check

[vldmr <vldmrrr@gmail.com>]

On Sep 2, 9:52 am, Adam Beneschan <a...@irvine.com> wrote:
> On Sep 2, 7:25 am, vldmr <vldm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Only if the actual parameter is mutable when you call the procedure.
...
>
> OK, so I'll bet your next question is: So how do I declare an object
> to be unconstrained (mutable), but give its discriminant an initial
> value other than the default (X520CommonName_teletexString)?
>
>    WXY : t_X520CommonName := (choice_Id =>
> X520CommonName_printableString,
>                               others => <>);
>
>                                           -- Adam

Oh, thank, make sense now. At least I see where my problem is. In my
case WXY is actually declared as access to record, and is initialized
using Unchecked_Conversion from external memory address, pointing to
zero filled memory.

Any advice how to declare an access to variant record to be mutable?

Thank you,

Vladimir