From: "jimmaureenrogers@worldnet.att.net" <jimmaureenrogers@worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: speed of generic code in Ada (vs Java)
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 11:12:35 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2008-05-16T11:12:35-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2e1de55a-69e5-439e-addc-bde650b4c16a@i36g2000prf.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 9e9bdae7-5e91-4e0c-b783-1ed72311a733@t12g2000prg.googlegroups.com
On May 16, 11:31 am, "jhc0...@gmail.com" <jhc0...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Java only allows 'objects' as generics parameters. So, if you define a
> generic class and use 'Integer' as a parameter, your code will be slow
> because of the boxing - up to 5x compared to non-generic Int (see the
> recent discussion in comp.lang.java.programmer - the 'numerics'
> thread). Is the situation similar with generics in Ada, GNAT,
> specifically?
No.
Jim Rogers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-16 18:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-16 17:31 speed of generic code in Ada (vs Java) jhc0033
2008-05-16 18:12 ` jimmaureenrogers [this message]
2008-05-16 18:54 ` Ludovic Brenta
2008-05-17 1:50 ` jhc0033
2008-05-17 2:04 ` Georg Bauhaus
2008-05-17 6:32 ` Niklas Holsti
2008-05-17 8:07 ` Ludovic Brenta
2008-05-17 21:37 ` Gautier
2008-05-17 23:31 ` Ivan Levashew
2008-05-22 22:01 ` Florian Weimer
2008-05-21 8:12 ` Graham
2008-05-21 15:41 ` Robert A Duff
2008-05-22 0:06 ` Randy Brukardt
2008-05-23 22:55 ` Robert A Duff
2008-05-24 0:16 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox