From: Mark.Doherty@uk.thalesgroup.com (Mark Doherty)
Subject: Re: Visibility of private packages??
Date: 31 Jul 2002 06:22:07 -0700
Date: 2002-07-31T13:22:08+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2d87db3f.0207310522.7236ea92@posting.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: DtD19.636$C8.2739@nnrp1.uunet.ca
>
> Does this mean that if A.B1.C1 is private, it can only be withed by the
> bodies of A.B1 and other descendants of A.B1, and specs of private packages
> of descendants of A.B1?
Yes
>
> If this is the case, how could I structure things to give the desired
> effect?
A private child is never visible outside the tree routed at its
parent. And within that tree it is not visable to the specifications
of public siblings!
Try looking in 'programming in ada95 2nd edition' by john barnes page
247. it has a nice diagram.
Mark
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-31 13:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-30 21:23 Visibility of private packages?? Peter Coventry
2002-07-31 9:13 ` John McCabe
2002-07-31 12:06 ` Dale Stanbrough
2002-07-31 13:30 ` Robert A Duff
2002-08-14 1:16 ` Randy Brukardt
2002-08-14 9:53 ` Dale Stanbrough
2002-08-14 17:03 ` Robert Dewar
2002-08-14 19:42 ` Randy Brukardt
2002-07-31 11:55 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2002-07-31 13:22 ` Mark Doherty [this message]
2002-07-31 17:43 ` Anh_Vo
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox