comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Noffke <patrick.noffke@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: GNAT runtime licensing mess
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 06:07:37 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2015-02-25T06:07:37-08:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2c848d3a-d7d8-49f2-9fd6-2277100cb58e@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87sidv6vii.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>

On Tuesday, February 24, 2015 at 11:59:18 AM UTC-6, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Patrick Noffke:
> 
> > This got me thinking -- who are AdaCore to choose whether or not to
> > include this clause?
> 
> This is explicitly permitted under the terms of the GNU General Public
> License, version 3, in section 7: "When you convey a copy of a covered
> work, you may at your option remove any additional permissions from
> that copy, or from any part of it."  (The GCC run-time library
> exception uses the additional permissions framework established by the
> GPL.)

Thank you for that.  It answers part of my questions.

Patrick

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-02-25 14:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-24 15:49 GNAT runtime licensing mess Patrick Noffke
2015-02-24 17:59 ` Florian Weimer
2015-02-24 19:43   ` David Botton
2015-02-24 20:30     ` Simon Wright
2015-02-24 22:03       ` David Botton
2015-02-25 17:46         ` Simon Wright
2015-02-25 14:07   ` Patrick Noffke [this message]
2015-02-27 19:59 ` Waldek Hebisch
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox