From: David Botton <david@botton.com>
Subject: Re: Using Class wide types as factories, is this legit?
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 14:27:01 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2014-09-23T14:27:01-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2bfcf64f-0e19-4cf5-96df-14a360d2cb05@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1ow7xs34a7j7z.1f0806cgaoh7r$.dlg@40tude.net>
> Regarding your design. The rule of thumb is that controlled and other
>
> copyable objects shall not have access discriminants.
rule of thumb? what would be your reasons to disallow?
I find creative uses for that as you can see.
I'll see if I can create a small reproducer first since if I can't then I know for sure is some place deeper in my code as you point out and which I've seen the case before.
David Botton
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-23 21:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-23 5:19 Using Class wide types as factories, is this legit? David Botton
2014-09-23 7:23 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2014-09-23 8:21 ` David Botton
2014-09-23 19:28 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2014-09-23 21:27 ` David Botton [this message]
2014-09-24 7:22 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2014-09-23 8:37 ` briot.emmanuel
2014-09-23 8:52 ` David Botton
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox