From: xorque <xorquewasp@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: Generalized serialization for enumeration types
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 04:33:37 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2009-08-26T04:33:37-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2b55b138-5827-480c-8095-256ad1b7e205@e27g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 54f0af10-4029-4209-84c4-163e3dcd56a9@r42g2000yqj.googlegroups.com
On Aug 26, 11:00 am, okellogg <okell...@freenet.de> wrote:
> If your enums are represented as you describe then why do you need
> representations?
> You could rely on the natural Ada representation (which happens to
> conform with your encoding rules as far as the enum values are
> concerned).
Erm. Where in the (2005) RM does it state that enums are encoded
at big-endian 32 bit integers?
xw
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-26 11:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-26 10:22 Generalized serialization for enumeration types xorque
2009-08-26 11:00 ` okellogg
2009-08-26 11:33 ` xorque [this message]
2009-08-26 12:03 ` okellogg
2009-08-26 11:17 ` Georg Bauhaus
2009-08-26 11:35 ` xorque
2009-08-26 12:05 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2009-08-26 19:44 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2009-08-27 5:05 ` sjw
2009-08-28 10:47 ` xorque
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox