Re: Ada to C Question

[mpowell_jr@hotmail.com (MPowell)]

tmoran@acm.org wrote in message news:<377ma.165206$OV.246750@rwcrnsc54>...
> >   type MYTYPE_YOURTYPE      is (MyType,                         -- 0
> >                                 YourType);                       -- 1
> >
> >   type YOURTYPE_MYTYPE     is (YourType,                       -- 0
> >                                 MyType);                        -- 1
>   Does the program actually care?  Does the representation or the
> ordering matter?  Could you perhaps change to
>     subtype YOURTYPE_MYTYPE is MYTYPE_YOURTYPE;
> with no effect?

I agree.  In the grand scheme of things I cant imagine/see why the
program woudl care and I'm taking the approach on converting such
that.

Ada
type SubSystem_ID is (A, B);
type System_ID is (A, B, C);

C
typedef enum {A, B, C } System_ID;
No need for 'SubSystem_ID'

If I get a consensus on  C versus ++ then i'll do as one poster
recommended even though it doenst appear feasible to use struct for
what could easily be done with enum.