Re: protected type interrupts

["Jeffrey R. Carter" <spam.not.jrcarter@acm.not.spam.org>]

REH wrote:
> 
> Another work-around suggested to me was to move the processing logic
> out of the entry and into the task, and just use the entry for the
> triggerring.  What do you think about this?

That is probably a good idea. Your protected object has a ceiling 
priority that is an interrupt priority, so the entry body, whether 
executed by the calling task or by the thread of control from the 
interrupt, is executed at an interrupt priority. It's not a good idea to 
do any extensive processing at an interrupt priority. Moving the 
processing into the task allows it to be done at a lower priority.

-- 
Jeff Carter
"Now go away or I shall taunt you a second time."
Monty Python & the Holy Grail
07