* Code reuse versus "cheating" (formerly: Using procedures)
@ 1994-12-08 0:02 Bennett, Chip (KTR) ~U
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Bennett, Chip (KTR) ~U @ 1994-12-08 0:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
Bob Wells #402 <wel@EUROCONTROL.DE> writes:
> "Bennett, Chip (KTR) ~U" <BennettC@J64.STRATCOM.AF.MIL> writes ...
>
> > But this brings up a bigger point that is the real reason I bother to
post
> > this. I want to promote Ada, but I question whether doing a students
> > homework is going too far. Comments?
>
> G'day,
> I thought we decided on a previous thread that this wasn't actually
"cheating"
> but actually a good example of code reuse!
> Bob W. (-:
Missed the previous thread, sorry.
I suppose in the old "punch card" days at school, when someone ran your deck
through a duplicator, that would be considered "code reuse". 8-)
*****************************************************************
* Chip Bennett, GDE Systems Inc | BennettC@j64.stratcom.af.mil *
* USSTRATCOM/J64213 | Voice (402)294-7360 *
* 901 SAC Blvd, Suite 2B24 | FAX (402)294-7912 *
* Offutt AFB, NE 68113-6600 | Proud member of Team Ada *
* Opinions expressed here are my own _so_, TTFWTW *
*****************************************************************
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~1994-12-08 0:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1994-12-08 0:02 Code reuse versus "cheating" (formerly: Using procedures) Bennett, Chip (KTR) ~U
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox