From: markb@sdcrdcf.UUCP
Subject: Re: ForTran-Ada ... (really function pointers)
Date: Fri, 11-Jul-86 11:38:51 EDT [thread overview]
Date: Fri Jul 11 11:38:51 1986
Message-ID: <2877@sdcrdcf.UUCP> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1330@psivax.UUCP
For 95% of the cases (e.g., Intgrators, numerical analysis, graphics etc.)
Generics provide a reasonable replacement for function pointers.
The other 5% of the time (e.g., EMACS) the emuneration mapping seems
to provide a moderatly reasonable replacement. I have still not seen an
example that is not covered by one of these two alternitives.
Mark Biggar
{allegra,burdvax,cbosgd,hplabs,ihnp4,akgua,sdcsvax}!sdcrdcf!markb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1986-07-11 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1986-05-28 15:54 ForTran-Ada + flamette + question richw
1986-05-30 12:46 ` Russ Holden
1986-06-20 15:36 ` ForTran-Ada + flamette + questi richw
1986-06-22 3:00 ` Russ Holden
1986-06-22 7:49 ` Enumerated "procedural" parameters Alastair Milne
1986-07-03 7:03 ` Dick Dunn
1986-07-10 22:26 ` ForTran-Ada + flamette + questi friesen
1986-07-11 15:38 ` markb [this message]
1986-07-14 17:01 ` richw
1986-07-18 21:59 ` vilot
1986-07-22 12:59 ` stt
1986-08-07 13:26 ` Christopher Reedy
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox