From: roseman@ccu.UManitoba.CA (roseman)
Subject: Re: performance benchmarking
Date: 12 Aug 89 14:25:59 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <284@ccu.UManitoba.CA> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1086@aber-cs.UUCP
Since posting that message, a few additional tests have been run:
Most of the Unix daemons were killed (using "killall") -- no effect
The iteration counts were bumped way up -- marginal effect
So we're still stumped in other words. For information's sake,
the timings are done by 9interfacing to the "C" routine
"times" within the program.
This should be much more accurate than either using the Unix time command or
A
the CALENDAR package.
A
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1989-08-12 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1989-08-09 0:27 performance benchmarking roseman
1989-08-10 8:22 ` Paul Warren
1989-08-12 14:25 ` roseman [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1989-08-30 7:01 Performance Benchmarking "Lennart M}nsson"
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox