Re: Initialization and Finalization of limited object "returned" by a function

["Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne)" <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>]

On 11 fév, 22:51, Adam Beneschan <a...@irvine.com> wrote:
> For an extended return,
>
>    return R : T;
>
> R is not a local variable, and it isn't "assigned" into the anonymous
> object; thus, there's no Adjust, and R is not finalized when the
> function returns
Yes

> (but the anonymous object will be finalized later,
Which anonymous object ?

> except when it mutates into some other object).
Ouch, requires clarifications (at least to me)

> I think that's the
> point of the nasty language in 3.10.2(10.1).
Do you suggest the behavior I'm experiencing is the expected one ?
(being nasty or not)

> Which is another way of
> saying that R is a name for the result (as you said),
What I was expecting, indeed

> not a distinct
> object that gets copied to the result.
I hope so : it's limited !

> I thought it would be helpful
> to point it out---not to you, but to other readers.  It's hardly a
> trivial difference, and it's an important one to understand when
> adjusts and finalizations are involved.  Anyway, I hope this helps
> someone.
Probably I'm one of the "other readers"

Well, I will later drive another experiment, a shorter one, as Robert/
Bob suggested the example source I gave was a bit too long to be
quickly studied.