From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen)
Subject: Re: Omission in the Ada Standard
Date: 25 Sep 2003 12:12:40 -0500
Date: 2003-09-25T12:12:40-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <27bIRIzistKH@eisner.encompasserve.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 657ea3e3.0309250705.3537b0b0@posting.google.com
In article <657ea3e3.0309250705.3537b0b0@posting.google.com>, rleif@rleif.com (Robert C. Leif) writes:
> While I was working on my latest project, the CellFuge, I was shocked
> to learn that Jerry van Dijk's Io_Ports package that I have did not
> compile with GNAT. I do need an up to date version. Since the Intel
> Pentium class of processors and their clones are a very large part of
> the software market, the possibility of port based IO should be
> included in Ada.
And what would the meaning be on some other processor for which a
standard-compliant Ada compiler is needed ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-25 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-25 15:05 Omission in the Ada Standard Robert C. Leif
2003-09-25 17:12 ` Larry Kilgallen [this message]
2003-09-25 19:47 ` Simon Wright
2003-09-26 1:51 ` Jeff C,
2003-09-26 2:02 ` Larry Kilgallen
2003-09-26 13:05 ` Vinzent 'Gadget' Hoefler
2003-10-06 3:50 ` Dave Thompson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-25 18:57 Robert C. Leif
2003-09-25 19:24 Beard, Frank Randolph CIV
2003-09-26 0:30 ` Larry Kilgallen
2003-09-26 16:10 ` Robert C. Leif
2003-09-26 17:38 ` Jeff C,
2003-09-28 21:43 ` Keith Thompson
2003-10-09 16:56 ` Jerry Petrey
2003-10-10 2:07 ` Jeff C,
2003-09-26 18:04 ` Jeff C,
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox