From: visicom!rlk@nosc.mil (Bob Kitzberger)
Subject: Re: Basic embedded concepts and Ada
Date: 12 Jan 93 22:12:18 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <262@visicom.com> (raw)
hawkinsg@saifr00.cfsat.honeywell.com (Glenn Hawkins) writes:
> Although our compiler is
> pretty efficient with word and byte level accesses, it pretty much chokes on
bit
> level accesses, so representing the different registers as records of bits
> (appropriately rep spec'ed, of course) doesn't seem practical.
Too bad; that's the preferred approach.
>I think that to set bits in these registers it would be easiest for
>me to define the objects representing the registers as 32-bit integers, allowi
ng
>me to simply add constants (1, 2, 4, 8, etc.) representing the different bits
>I want to set. Just like I would in JOVIAL, C, etc.
Don't forget that unsigned 32-bit integers are rarely supported in Ada
on 32-bit CPUs, so it's not as easy as you might wish to set the MSB.
>Seeing if a bit has been set seems more difficult. [...] I would like to
avoid machine code insertions if possible. Any ideas?
Since bit-level rep specs appear to be broken in your compiler, I'd use
machine code insertions to implement ANDs, ORs, etc. I know you want
to avoid them (for portability reasons?), but if they're documented
as a workaround you can mitigate risk.
Then, call your Ada compiler vendor and ask them to fix rep specs.
.Bob.
----------------
Bob Kitzberger VisiCom Laboratories, Inc.
rlk@visicom.com 10052 Mesa Ridge Court, San Diego CA 92121 USA
+1 619 457 2111 FAX +1 619 457 0888
next reply other threads:[~1993-01-12 22:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1993-01-12 22:12 Bob Kitzberger [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1993-01-06 18:15 Basic embedded concepts and Ada Mark A Biggar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox