* Any potential GNAT.* package license issues ?
@ 2006-07-01 0:19 Simon Clubley
2006-07-02 10:33 ` Martin Krischik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Simon Clubley @ 2006-07-01 0:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
Given the ACT change on GtkAda licensing, can anyone see any potential
problems with continuing to use the GNAT.* packages in the FSF GCC kits
under the current GMGPL license ?
Thanks for any information,
Simon.
--
Simon Clubley, clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP
If Google's motto is "don't be evil", then how did we get Google Groups 2 ?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Any potential GNAT.* package license issues ?
2006-07-01 0:19 Any potential GNAT.* package license issues ? Simon Clubley
@ 2006-07-02 10:33 ` Martin Krischik
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Martin Krischik @ 2006-07-02 10:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
Simon Clubley wrote:
> Given the ACT change on GtkAda licensing, can anyone see any potential
> problems with continuing to use the GNAT.* packages in the FSF GCC kits
> under the current GMGPL license ?
They still have the exception in every source file.
Martin
--
mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net
Ada programming at: http://adakrischik.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-07-02 10:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-07-01 0:19 Any potential GNAT.* package license issues ? Simon Clubley
2006-07-02 10:33 ` Martin Krischik
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox