From: visicom!rlk@nosc.mil (Bob Kitzberger)
Subject: Re: Language pitfalls (was Re: FORTRAN bug)
Date: 16 Dec 92 17:38:07 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <256@visicom.com> (raw)
eachus@oddjob.mitre.org (Robert I. Eachus) writes:
> (What Robert Dewar and I objected to was that certain functions
>whose only intended effect is to raise an exception must still contain
>a return statement. This results in junk return statements in stubbed
>out code, and makes a stubber much harder to write.)
Robert, I can't think of a reason to have a function that does nothing
but raise an exception... can you provide an example? (I'm not
questioning the need for it -- just curious)
.Bob.
----------------
Bob Kitzberger VisiCom Laboratories, Inc.
rlk@visicom.com 10052 Mesa Ridge Court, San Diego CA 92121 USA
+1 619 457 2111 FAX +1 619 457 0888
next reply other threads:[~1992-12-16 17:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1992-12-16 17:38 Bob Kitzberger [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1992-12-17 18:48 Language pitfalls (was Re: FORTRAN bug) John Halper
1992-12-17 14:18 Terry J. Westley
1992-12-17 1:31 Robert I. Eachus
1992-12-16 20:59 John Bollenbacher
1992-12-16 20:02 Julian C . Lander
1992-12-16 17:27 Mark A Biggar
1992-12-16 16:32 olivea!spool.mu.edu!yale.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!ennews
1992-12-16 14:38 crispen
1992-12-16 1:22 Robert I. Eachus
1992-12-15 20:35 news.centerline.com!noc.near.net!inmet!spock!stt
1992-12-15 18:08 Richard Pattis
1992-12-15 15:47 Michael Feldman
1992-12-15 14:55 David Emery
1992-12-15 13:55 enterpoop.mit.edu!eru.mt.luth.se!lunic!sunic!news.lth.se!dag
1992-12-14 21:57 Bob Kitzberger
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox