From: Mark Lorenzen <mark.lorenzen@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Question regarding example code in AI12-0140
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 03:11:26 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2014-10-31T03:11:26-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <25600fdf-9685-4066-87a2-b66085a937bd@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <faf21058-7255-4b11-b57b-55b5641d5ccd@googlegroups.com>
On Thursday, October 30, 2014 5:21:04 PM UTC+1, Adam Beneschan wrote:
> There are no formal generic types in this example, because you're not defining a generic. Perhaps you're confused because (<>) has been used since Ada 83 in formal generic types to mean "formal generic discrete type"? But the (<>) syntax was given a new job in Ada 95.
Of course - my bad! Thanks for the clarification.
Regards,
Mark L
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-31 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-30 15:59 Question regarding example code in AI12-0140 Mark Lorenzen
2014-10-30 16:21 ` Adam Beneschan
2014-10-31 10:11 ` Mark Lorenzen [this message]
2014-10-31 19:40 ` AdaMagica
2014-11-01 15:31 ` Brad Moore
2014-11-08 3:58 ` Randy Brukardt
2014-11-08 19:20 ` AdaMagica
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox