Re: Debugger Rant

[mcq95@earthlink.net (Marc A. Criley)]

"Robert I. Eachus" <rieachus@attbi.com> wrote in message news:<3F148F80.1000708@attbi.com>...
> Brian Catlin wrote:
> 
> > I might be way off here, but it seems to me that you're using the debugger to
> > debug your understanding of the problem/program, rather than writing
> > specifications to figure out what you're really trying to do ahead of time.
> > Granted, that in today's environment, it is hard for management to accept
> > writing specs before coding, every study I've ever seen has shown that writing
> > specs ahead of time improves the development process and the quality of the code
> > produced.
> 
> Amen!  I just finished another post to the same effect.

Brian is way off here.

Where Bob uses Notepad or a sheet of paper, I use a whiteboard for the
same purpose.  I've got a good track record of bringing software in on
time that meets its requirements.

A debugger, like a whiteboard, is a powerful software development
tool, and I would fiercely oppose giving up either of them, or having
someone level at me the notion that they were simply a crutch.

After several years of reading the occasional response to an Ada
newbie that they'll virtually never need a debugger when programming
in Ada (as well as that if the code compiles, it'll probably work)--I
just got fed up with it.