comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adam Beneschan <adam@irvine.com>
Subject: Re: Obtaining access to protected object
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 08:03:59 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2008-07-09T08:03:59-07:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <247f4dc5-44d8-4618-9fdf-140286ac8d0e@m45g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 72741a06-d96c-4f53-a80b-3595c513efa1@27g2000hsf.googlegroups.com

On Jul 8, 1:41 pm, Maciej Sobczak <see.my.homep...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Consider 9.4-21/2:
>
> "Within the declaration or body of a protected unit other than in an
> access_definition, the name of the protected unit denotes the current
> instance of the unit"
>
> I understand that this allows me to obtain the access to the current
> object (the "this" access) of the protected object.
> Let's try:
>
>    protected type P is
>       procedure Foo;
>    end P;
>
>    protected body P is
>       procedure Foo is
>          Ptr : access P;   -- P denotes the type P
>       begin
>          Ptr := P'Access;    -- here P denotes the "this" instance of
> P
>       end;
>    end P;
>
> This is what GNAT has to say about it: ""Access" attribute cannot be
> applied to type".
> As far as I understand, this is in conflict with the AARM paragraph
> mentioned above.
>
> Am I doing something wrong or is it a compiler bug?

It's a compiler bug.

                        -- Adam




  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-09 15:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-08 20:41 Obtaining access to protected object Maciej Sobczak
2008-07-09 15:03 ` Adam Beneschan [this message]
2008-07-09 21:21   ` Maciej Sobczak
2008-07-09 21:57     ` Adam Beneschan
2008-07-09 22:01     ` Georg Bauhaus
2008-07-10  0:39     ` Randy Brukardt
2008-07-09 15:33 ` george.priv
2008-07-09 19:27   ` Adam Beneschan
2008-07-10  2:10     ` george.priv
2008-07-10 14:46       ` Adam Beneschan
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox