From: Jere <jhb.chat@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Limited object by reference or access argument?
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 07:10:41 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2017-08-07T07:10:41-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <24712b44-48d9-4763-a748-458b7b77d835@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <om80vg$1a68$1@gioia.aioe.org>
On Sunday, August 6, 2017 at 5:16:37 PM UTC-4, Victor Porton wrote:
> Suppose we have
>
> type World_Type is tagged limited private;
>
> type BNode_ID_Handler is abstract tagged limited private;
>
> We need to set a bnode handler for a world object. Should the procedure
> signature be
>
> procedure Set_Handler (World: World_Type;
> Handler: access BNode_ID_Handler'Class);
>
> or
>
> procedure Set_Handler (World: World_Type;
> Handler: BNode_ID_Handler'Class);
>
> The later can work with limited BNode_ID_Handler type, because tagged and
> limited types are always passed by reference.
>
> I prefer the second one, because with the first procedure signature it is
> possible to pass an access to an already finalized object what is an error,
> but want to ask you opinion which of the two procedure signatures is better.
>
> --
> Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org
You can also just make it tagged (Ada95 to present) or denote the
procedure parameter as aliased (Ada2012):
procedure Set_Handler (World: World_Type;
Handler: aliased in out BNode_ID_Handler'Class);
I am not sure of the limitations to that as it is a new feature I
am less experienced with.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-07 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-06 21:16 Limited object by reference or access argument? Victor Porton
2017-08-06 22:01 ` Victor Porton
2017-08-06 23:21 ` Victor Porton
2017-08-07 0:35 ` Victor Porton
2017-08-07 23:31 ` Randy Brukardt
2017-08-07 14:10 ` Jere [this message]
2017-08-07 23:28 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox