comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: brett@tle.enet.dec.com (Bevin)
Subject: Re: You get what you pay for (not true in software)
Date: 21 Jun 91 01:23:10 GMT	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <23735@shlump.lkg.dec.com> (raw)


In article <EMERY.91Jun20145620@Dr_No.mitre.org>, emery@Dr_No.mitre.org (David Emery) writes...
>Probably the greatest benefit from the ALS and AIE government-funded
>Ada compiler contracts is the large number of people who worked at
>SofTech and Intermetrics, and then went on to build a second
>(successful) Ada compiler (usually somewhere else).  This is a side of
>Ada technology transfer that has not been adequately recognized and
>acknowledged as part of an Ada success story.
> 
>				dave emery

I don't know about the other compiler vendors, but I suspect that the
major ones [DEC, Rational, Verdix, Alsys...] and many of the others [...]
had already completed their first Ada products by the time the large numbers
of people from SofTech and Intermetrics came looking for jobs.  I know that
was the case at DEC, and are fairly sure about the other three I named.

/Bevin

             reply	other threads:[~1991-06-21  1:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1991-06-21  1:23 Bevin [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1991-06-13 18:53 You get what you pay for (not true in software) leisner.henr801c
1991-06-20 13:50 ` RICK CARLE
1991-06-20 19:56   ` David Emery
1991-06-21 22:10     ` Jim Showalter
1991-06-21 14:59   ` Dan L. Pierson
1991-06-13 18:53 leisner.henr801c
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox