From: awdorrin <awdorrin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: GNAT 4.4.5 order of conditional processing?
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:49:47 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2011-11-15T13:49:47-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <22d4b4be-1a2e-435c-9b92-fbda6999a4f3@d17g2000yql.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: op.v40a1xcvlzeukk@jellix.jlfencey.com
On Nov 15, 4:23 pm, "Vinzent Hoefler"
<0439279208b62c95f1880bf0f8776...@t-domaingrabbing.de> wrote:
> awdorrin wrote:
> > So I am assuming by your response that there are no pragmas or GNAT
> > compiler flags to enforce the order of evaluation?
>
> Nope. The compiler plays by the language rules only.
>
Figured that was is, sloppy programming that just managed to work (for
20 years) due to a compiler implementation... ;-)
>
> --
> f u cn rd ths, u cn gt a gd jb n cmptr prgrmmng.
I love your signature! :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-15 21:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-15 20:30 GNAT 4.4.5 order of conditional processing? awdorrin
2011-11-15 20:54 ` Niklas Holsti
2011-11-15 21:07 ` awdorrin
2011-11-15 21:23 ` Vinzent Hoefler
2011-11-15 21:49 ` awdorrin [this message]
2011-11-16 21:31 ` Gautier write-only
2011-11-16 22:40 ` Adam Beneschan
2011-11-17 0:00 ` Adam Beneschan
2011-11-15 23:08 ` Jeffrey Carter
2011-11-16 1:18 ` Adam Beneschan
2011-11-16 5:33 ` tmoran
2011-11-16 17:52 ` awdorrin
2011-11-16 20:01 ` Simon Wright
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox