comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Krischik <martin@krischik.com>
Subject: Re: What is the best source of GNAT for Win32?
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 19:20:44 +0100
Date: 2004-12-26T19:20:44+01:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2267527.9HDeXFcgkv@linux1.krischik.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: mailman.6.1104082650.527.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org

Robert C. Leif wrote:

>    Since GNAT has become the dominant Ada compiler and AdaCore does not
> appear to be providing binary distributions, a new source for a binary
> distribution including a simple install needs to be created. 

Good idea. Compiling Windows versions arn't that easy.

> One other 
> possibility would be to provide a binary distribution of A# that was
> independent of GNAT.

>    This distribution of an Ada compiler should include a development
> environment.  This could be a functioning version of the AdaCore's GPS or
> integration with Microsoft's Visual Studio.

GPS is probably better.

> Does the available public 
> version of GPS have a functioning pretty printer? 

No, Pretty Printer is a part of the ASIS tools (GNAT ASIS contains not only
the ASIS lib itself but also some tools) and there is no cvs for ASIS yet.
So unless you know a supported customer who is willing to copy it, it's bad
look.

> In order to serve as 
> the basis of an Ada environment, AdaGide needs a browse or point and click
> means for inclusion of the paths to packages.

>    It would be appropriate to charge a reasonable fee for providing a
>    binary
> distribution of a complete development environment that includes a
> complete Ada compiler.

--enable-languages=c,ada

and

--enable-languages=c,ada,c++,f77,java,objc

is not that much difference. And GPS supports C and C++ as well. No reason
to restrict yourself to Ada only.

> A reasonable range for this fee would be 25 to 100 
> dollars.

For the complete tool chain, yes. I always thougt about that - especialy for
windows where the compile is very tricky.

If you inedeed plan that: why not thow in a Linux distribution as well. Much
easier to compile and extends the list of pontential customers
significantly.

I for one would be very interested at a symetric Windows/Linux GCC tool
chain.

With Regards

Martin
-- 
mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net
http://www.ada.krischik.com



  reply	other threads:[~2004-12-26 18:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-12-26 17:36 What is the best source of GNAT for Win32? Robert C. Leif
2004-12-26 18:20 ` Martin Krischik [this message]
2004-12-26 21:48   ` Jeff C r e e.m
2004-12-27  8:37     ` Martin Krischik
2004-12-26 18:21 ` Jeff C r e e.m
2004-12-27  0:30 ` tmoran
2004-12-27  5:36 ` David Botton
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-12-24  4:39 Steve
2004-12-24  9:10 ` Pascal Obry
2004-12-24  9:48 ` Martin Krischik
2004-12-24 14:02   ` Steve
2004-12-25  9:32     ` Martin Krischik
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox