From: cis.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!tully .CS.Berkeley.EDU!hilfingr@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU (Paul N. Hilfinger)
Subject: Re: Admiral Tuttle
Date: 7 Jul 93 00:39:55 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <21d60r$1ef@agate.berkeley.edu> (raw)
Admiral Tuttle's remarks contain at least one odd comment:
In article <1993Jul6.203058.4738@oracorp.com>, davidg@oracorp.com (David Guaspa
ri) writes:
> ADA does not effectively support object-oriented
> programming -- distributed computing -- and massively parallel processors
> now -- and ADA 9X will not provide many capabilities already widely
> available through C++ and parallel implementations of C.
I was not aware that any capabilities are "WIDELY available" through
"parallel implementations" of C (I presume he means "implementations
of C with extensions supporting parallelism"). What is he referring
to here?
Also, what are the capabilities he refers to that Ada 9X will not
provide? I am particularly curious about what HE is referring to, not
what others of us might answer to the question "What is Ada 9X
missing?"
Paul Hilfinger
next reply other threads:[~1993-07-07 0:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1993-07-07 0:39 Paul N. Hilfinger [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1993-07-07 14:56 Admiral Tuttle Gregory Aharonian
1993-07-07 16:16 Ka rl S Mathias
1993-07-07 21:04 Pat Rogers
1993-07-08 5:46 Jam es Olsen
1993-07-08 16:58 Wes Groleau X7574
1993-07-08 19:43 David Emery
1993-07-09 6:10 agate!overload.lbl.gov!dog.ee.lbl.gov!network.ucsd.edu!munnari.oz.au!news
1993-07-09 16:43 agate!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!csc.ti.com
1993-07-09 19:44 agate!howland.reston.ans.net!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!The-Star.honeywell.com!
1993-07-12 10:51 cis.ohio-state.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!ajpo.sei.cmu.edu!wellerd
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox