From: agnew@trwrc.UUCP (R.A. Agnew)
Subject: Re: processing order
Date: Thu, 3-Sep-87 16:13:39 EDT [thread overview]
Date: Thu Sep 3 16:13:39 1987
Message-ID: <217@trwrc.UUCP> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 8708292239.AA14468@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU
In article <8708292239.AA14468@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> HEARNE@wwu.EDU writes:
>
>Entry calls are not processed in sending order. In some systems,
>such as ones in which the callers resided on different processors,
>the adminstrative overhead and, in some cases, waiting would
>be intolerable.
>
>--Jim Hearne
Maybe thats true in some systems but it can't be true in embedded
real-time systems. (remember what Ada is for)
If it is true, then I've got a few million dollars worth of real-time
systems sitting out here that are never going to work! I'm going to talk
to the run-time kernal designer about it right now. Does the Stanford
system have that problem?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1987-09-03 20:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1987-08-28 19:32 processing order HEARNE
1987-09-03 20:13 ` R.A. Agnew [this message]
1987-09-06 15:47 ` David S. Rosenblum
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox