From: "Rego, P." <pvrego@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Constructors with multiple inheritance
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 12:14:35 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2011-09-30T12:14:35-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2179298.1737.1317410075987.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqgn17> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <wccoby2uh6w.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
> It's fine to use the prefix notation if you think it's more readable,
> but you shouldn't attach any semantic significance to it -- it really is
> just syntactic sugar.
Ok. I will not (attach extra significance).
> You can't use an operation of an object to create that same object,
> because it doesn't exist yet.
I agree, with this declaration. But maybe Dmitry has given me a good idea if I declare the method for an access parameter (so the null problem would not exist anymore, right?).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-30 19:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-29 19:40 Constructors with multiple inheritance Rego, P.
2011-09-29 20:20 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-09-30 3:11 ` Rego, P.
2011-09-30 7:36 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-09-30 14:04 ` Rego, P.
2011-09-30 16:29 ` Robert A Duff
2011-09-30 19:14 ` Rego, P. [this message]
2011-09-30 16:42 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-09-30 19:42 ` Rego, P.
2011-10-06 12:46 ` Julian Leyh
2011-11-09 2:24 ` Rego, P.
2011-11-09 8:39 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-11-10 3:47 ` Rego, P.
2011-11-10 7:09 ` AdaMagica
2011-11-10 7:20 ` AdaMagica
2011-11-10 8:35 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-11-12 15:16 ` Rego, P.
2011-11-12 15:30 ` Rego, P.
2011-11-12 16:28 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-11-12 17:41 ` Rego, P.
2011-11-10 8:33 ` Simon Wright
2011-11-10 9:01 ` Georg Bauhaus
2011-11-10 9:09 ` Georg Bauhaus
2011-11-10 18:16 ` Jeffrey Carter
2011-11-10 19:39 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-11-09 9:00 ` Simon Wright
2011-11-10 3:54 ` Rego, P.
2011-10-07 0:08 ` Shark8
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox