From: Robert Eachus <rieachus@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: anonymous records as tuples
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 12:17:05 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2018-03-12T12:17:05-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2153155f-2778-421f-97cb-4d229fb9355b@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4cf2a76e-626d-4ead-ae8a-dccdef41b283@googlegroups.com>
On Monday, March 12, 2018 at 1:32:46 PM UTC-4, Stephen Leake wrote:
> I recently had to change a function that returned a single integer into a procedure that returns two...
What is wrong with something like:
-- in Tree:
type Return_Values is record
Real : Integer;
Virtual : Integer;
end record;
function Count_Terminals (Index...) return Return_Values;
...
declare
Returned: constant Tree.Return_Values := Tree.Count_Terminals(Index);
Real: Integer renames Returned.Real;
Virtual: Integer renames Returned.Virtual;
begin
if Virtual = 0 then
Next_Shared_Token := Next_Shared_Token - Real;
end if;
end;
Declaring Returned as a constant is optional. (And declaring Real as an Integer really rubs me wrong. But this is a example...)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-12 19:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-12 17:32 anonymous records as tuples Stephen Leake
2018-03-12 18:01 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2018-03-12 19:17 ` Robert Eachus [this message]
2018-03-12 19:34 ` Stephen Leake
2018-03-12 23:59 ` Randy Brukardt
2018-03-13 2:51 ` Dan'l Miller
2018-03-13 8:28 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2018-03-12 21:09 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox