From: agnew@trwrc.UUCP (R.A. Agnew)
Subject: Re: Reply to Lt Scott Norton's Maintenance argument
Date: Wed, 26-Aug-87 14:19:17 EDT [thread overview]
Date: Wed Aug 26 14:19:17 1987
Message-ID: <207@trwrc.UUCP> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 870825204025.575689@HI-MULTICS.ARPA
In article <870825204025.575689@HI-MULTICS.ARPA> Kamrad@HI-MULTICS.ARPA writes:
>I know your point is well-taken and well meaning but I don't know a
>Program Manager of major weapon build who really cares about
Quit talking to your PMs and read your contract. If you
have a DOD-2167 and /or DOD-2168 requirement then you have
a problem. If you don't you will. Your PM doesn't care about
Life-Cycle-Costs but the folks who awarded the bid to you do.
Care to mention who your customer is?
Disclaimer -- These opinions are entirely my own and do
not reflect on my employer in any way.
prev parent reply other threads:[~1987-08-26 18:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1987-08-25 20:40 Reply to Lt Scott Norton's Maintenance argument Kamrad
1987-08-26 18:19 ` R.A. Agnew [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox