From: stt@inmet.inmet.com
Subject: Re: Types defining h/w r/o or w/o regis
Date: 1 Jun 91 10:01:00 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20600105@inmet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3949@titan.tsd.arlut.utexas.edu
Re: Read-only types
Rather than associating the Read-only-ness with the
type, I would associate it with the object.
The simplest implementation is to declare the object
in a package body, with an appropriate address clause,
and then define a parameterless function to return
the value of the object. This function could be inlined.
S. Tucker Taft stt@inmet.inmet.com
Intermetrics, Inc.
Cambridge, MA 02138
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1991-06-01 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1991-05-30 13:03 Types defining h/w r/o or w/o registers Don Gardner
1991-05-31 17:03 ` david.c.willett
1991-05-31 17:10 ` david.c.willett
1991-05-31 17:26 ` J o s e D u a r t e
1991-06-01 8:34 ` Orville R. Weyrich
1991-06-01 10:01 ` stt [this message]
1991-06-02 16:54 ` rharwood
1991-06-03 7:57 ` Orville R. Weyrich
1991-06-04 14:08 ` John Goodenough
1991-06-04 14:48 ` Anthony Shipman
1991-06-05 13:59 ` John Goodenough
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox