comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ryer@inmet.inmet.com
Subject: Re: was compiler bashing
Date: 15 Aug 90 13:18:00 GMT	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20600057@inmet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 155432@<1990Aug10


I truly enjoy compiler bashing.  Even if its my own (Intermetrics) compiler,
I enjoy it if it's well done.

Customer service, reliability, and continuous improvement are very important
in compiler selection.  You cannot find out about it from the vendor.  Though
they may not deliberately lie, they will certainly have blind spots regarding
their own faults.  Discussion on the net is one reasonable source of
independent assessment of vendor support.

However, I note that nearly all the bashing has been directed at Verdix.  To
the best of my knowledge, they are not the worst, and none of the other
vendors are perfect.  So, my plea is for some bashing of other compilers
as well.  Lets get ALL the dirt out in the open.

Mike Ryer
Intermetrics

       reply	other threads:[~1990-08-15 13:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <155432@<1990Aug10>
1990-08-15 13:18 ` ryer [this message]
1990-08-16 13:47   ` was compiler bashing Terry J. Westley
1990-08-16 14:51   ` Michael Endrizzi 
1990-08-09 19:17 Flame on Verdix, Any other good Unix compilers??? Michael Endrizzi 
1990-08-10 14:41 ` was compiler bashing Karl A. Nyberg
1990-08-10 15:54   ` Michael Endrizzi 
1990-08-13 18:50     ` Vladimir G. Ivanovic
1990-08-13 20:28       ` Michael Endrizzi 
1990-08-14 13:14         ` John Townsend
1990-08-13 21:26       ` Thomas A Peterson
1990-08-14 19:03       ` Lennart AtternaesTT/UO
1990-08-12  5:02   ` Bob Kitzberger @sation
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox