From: Shawn Barber <SbarberNOksSPAM@snet.net>
Subject: Variant Records
Date: 1999/09/14
Date: 1999-09-14T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202784de.3f456337@usw-ex0106-042.remarq.com> (raw)
I have recently run into a small problem using variant
records. I have been forced (against my better judgement) to
use a data structure consisting of a variant record, and in
this variant record a field of a particular variant is
another variant record. I already know the pain which has
been inflicted by using such a data structure. My question
is when I do a compare, say Var_1 = Var_2 or an assignment
are the fields compaired/assigned field by field or all at
once or in some other manor? Thanks.
Shawn
* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!
next reply other threads:[~1999-09-14 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-09-14 0:00 Shawn Barber [this message]
1999-09-14 0:00 ` Variant Records Matthew Heaney
1999-09-14 0:00 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
1999-09-14 0:00 ` Mark Lundquist
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-15 22:51 Variant records Ganesh Ramasivan
2004-02-16 10:57 ` Preben Randhol
2004-02-16 15:25 ` Ganesh Ramasivan
2004-02-16 15:46 ` Ludovic Brenta
2004-02-16 16:16 ` Preben Randhol
2004-02-17 14:37 ` Ganesh Ramasivan
2004-02-17 15:43 ` Preben Randhol
2004-02-16 16:59 ` Ganesh Ramasivan
2004-02-16 20:14 ` Simon Wright
2004-02-17 14:56 ` Ganesh Ramasivan
2004-02-17 15:31 ` Robert I. Eachus
2004-02-16 23:17 ` tmoran
1986-10-31 9:08 variant records Dean Luick
1986-11-03 14:17 ` Bev Sobelman
1986-11-05 16:35 ` stuart
1986-11-06 15:40 ` stt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox