Re: DDS and Ada

[Martyn Pike <martyn at emconuk dot com>]

On 2011-07-05 21:59:54 +0100, Maciej Sobczak said:

> On Jul 5, 9:34�pm, Martyn Pike <martyn at emconuk dot com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi. �Has anyone that frequencts this group ever successfully deployed
>> an Ada based DDS systems ? �Either using a COTS or custom
>> implementation.
> 
> Do you insist on the exact DDS implementation or is your interest of
> wider scope?
> If you really need DDS, then I think RTI has an Ada binding to one of
> their products.
> Otherwise you might also want to have a look at this:
> 
> http://www.inspirel.com/yami4/
> 
> This system can be used as a lightweight alternative to DDS,
> especially with its flexible message broker that supports publish-
> subscribe with hierarchic multiway message matching. As a side note,
> this broker was actually implemented in Ada, which is unlike most
> (all?) messaging products out there that merely offer a thin binding
> or a client interface to something implemented in C or Java.
> 
> In either case, don't hesitate to post your findings or conclusions
> here, the subject of distributed systems is very much Ada-related.

My interest is in the wider scope but specifically the interoperability 
of different solutions.
I understand that different CORBA ORBs can talk to eachother but I am 
less convinced
different DDS implementations can talk to eachother.  So a C++ DDS 
publisher and an
Ada DDS subscriber as per the spec is what I am looking for.  Ada DDS 
implementations seem
thin on the ground