From: Robert Love <rblove@airmail.net>
Subject: Re: SBIRS, Ada and Ignorance
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:01:57 -0000
Date: 2005-12-23T17:01:57+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051223110200413-0600@news.airmail.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: NhHqf.36784$dO2.21414@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net
In <NhHqf.36784$dO2.21414@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net> wrote:
> Since my name (creatively spelled, but I think Robert meant me) came
> up in the discussion below, I will research the matter and see if I
> can get an email off to the right people from my DoD account.
Yes, it was your name I was mangling.
>
> I'll probably get myself in trouble, but it won't be the first time.
>
> As to the term "bozo," none of the USAF people involved deserve this
> appellation. They
> are simply reacting to the ignorance about Ada that seems to prevail
> throughout the larger software community. My experience with the
> USAF decision-makers is that they are doing their best to make
> responsible decisions on behalf of the National Defense. They are
> being misinformed by contractors whose self-interest sometimes
> preempts what ought to be their better judgement.
At the level of the Secretary and Undersecretary I expect them to be far
removed from direct knowledge of the progject but somebody dropped the
ball. I expect it is in the USAF Project office. Those managers have
an oversight responsilbity and since it involves billions of tax payer
dollars and national defense it is a task that should not just rely on
the contractors information. Did this project have a V&V contractor?
I'll have to look.
I do note that Secretary Wynne has previously worked for LockMart, the
prime contractor for SBIRS. It may be that he is too cosy with his old
employers but I doubt it.
It should be noted that the USAF has several big ticket satellite
programs all well over budget and years behind schedule. T-Sat, Space
Based Radar and others join SBIRS as projects in trouble. Most of them
are due to sensor problems and general poor management. Some should be
more like R&D programs that operational projects.
Since the Secretary has brought up software as an issue on this
satellite I want to know what was the real cause of the problem. I
can't believe Ada is a cause in its own right. Was it compiler/tool
problems? Was it a bad software architecture? Was there a valid set of
requirements that were stable?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-23 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-22 16:25 SBIRS, Ada and Ignorance Robert Love
2005-12-22 17:12 ` Björn Persson
2005-12-22 18:48 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2005-12-22 21:25 ` Robert Love
2005-12-23 0:12 ` adaworks
2005-12-23 17:01 ` Robert Love [this message]
[not found] ` <eneoq1p0jo46iktlreebnpihas50cbr75l@4ax.com>
2005-12-24 18:49 ` Joseph Vlietstra
2005-12-27 17:12 ` Marco
2005-12-28 17:23 ` Joseph Vlietstra
2006-01-04 6:35 ` Robert Klungle
2005-12-29 2:26 ` Robert Love
2005-12-29 21:47 ` David Emery
2006-01-04 6:33 ` Robert Klungle
2005-12-24 1:12 ` Steve Whalen
2005-12-24 9:25 ` Larry Kilgallen
2005-12-22 22:16 ` tmoran
2005-12-23 21:08 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2005-12-22 22:26 ` Gene
2005-12-23 17:05 ` Robert Love
2005-12-23 1:23 ` David Emery
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox