From: rprice9979@aol.com (RPrice9979)
Subject: Re: Non-Stub In Inner Scope?
Date: 20 May 2001 10:50:18 GMT
Date: 2001-05-20T10:50:18+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010520065018.25233.00000485@ng-ck1.aol.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: z2CN6.660$ce.1111604@newsrump.sjc.telocity.net
Another solution is to make procedure Put_Line a separate. In procedure
Put_Line make the declaration for Wont_Work just as written.
This solution require 2 files instead of 1, but it does keep the abstraction
layer the same.
Ronald J. Price
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-20 10:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-05-19 21:42 Non-Stub In Inner Scope? Dr Nancy's Sweetie
2001-05-19 22:01 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
2001-05-19 23:08 ` Robert A Duff
2001-05-20 10:50 ` RPrice9979 [this message]
2001-05-20 3:15 ` Jeffrey Carter
2001-05-20 12:29 ` Marc A. Criley
2001-05-20 20:07 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox