From: xanthian@well.com (Kent Paul Dolan)
Subject: Re: "Ada 95 is certainly aimed at serious software engineering." in article.
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2001 23:47:27 +0000 (UTC)
Date: 2001-04-28T23:47:27+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200104282347.QAA24952@well.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 9cchj2011md@drn.newsguy.com
> http://www.elj.com/cppcv3/s5/
> After reading the above, I wonder why anyone would use C or C++ in
> place of Ada.
That is an interesting conclusion, from rather
thin support in the article you cite.
To me, the _entire_ substantive content of the
article could be stated:
C++ is no good, Eiffel is great.
The rest was just noise, conclusions without evidence.
It was certainly kind of the author to mention
Ada, but to me that mention was more a dismissal,
and "oh, sure, Ada is _aimed_ at serious software
engineering, now moving right along to something
important", not a recommendation.
Cheers!
xanthian.
--
Kent Paul Dolan <xanthian@well.com>
--
Posted from smtp.well.com [208.178.101.27]
via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-04-28 23:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-27 19:33 "Ada 95 is certainly aimed at serious software engineering." in article pref
2001-04-28 23:47 ` Kent Paul Dolan [this message]
2001-04-29 2:15 ` Ed Falis
2001-05-05 4:29 ` Lao Xiao Hai
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox