From: anthonygair@aol.comremoveme (ANTHONY GAIR)
Subject: Re: Software Development
Date: 2000/05/07
Date: 2000-05-07T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20000507094437.10742.00001809@ng-bj1.aol.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 8es3sf$2q2$1@nnrp1.deja.com
In the interests of furthering arguments for no reason,
CMM is far better than ISO9000 despite being created by the U.S.
ISO inspectors maybe are far easier to fool or bribe.
CMM actually works in a commercial environment for the benefit of the Employee.
I do however admit to stirring and smoking pots.
Are ADA and linux a good combination :-
www.remotely.useful.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-05-07 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-04-27 0:00 Software Development Chris
2000-04-27 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
2000-04-28 0:00 ` Ehud Lamm
2000-04-28 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
2000-05-03 0:00 ` ANTHONY GAIR
2000-05-03 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
2000-05-03 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
2000-05-04 0:00 ` Wes Groleau
2000-05-05 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
2000-05-05 0:00 ` Marin D. Condic
2000-05-04 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
2000-05-04 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-05-07 0:00 ` ANTHONY GAIR [this message]
2000-05-07 0:00 ` Hyman Rosen
2000-05-08 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
2000-05-09 0:00 ` ANTHONY GAIR
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox